Return to revision history
Revision as of 22:40:13, 29 April 2021 by Gerberlb
Revision as of 10:57:30, 4 May 2021 by Gerberlb
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[illegible] unreasonably  [illegible] must be permittance is thanks. [illegible] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like [illegible] from them [illegible] if they [illegible] natural [illegible] is leasing before them business [illegible]? So far from aiding them [illegible] removal, by [illegible] is them just wishes. I thereby withdrawing all [illegible] in the way of emigration. The [illegible] the affirmation [illegible] already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily [illegible] conforming to law and with a rigid [illegible] to [illegible]. Why then the determined refusal [illegible]? Can it be possible that "force"  is a thing [illegible] be a [illegible] reliable resort for [illegible] with a [illegible] half [illegible] nation of Indians [illegible] right of [illegible]? [illegible] desire to have an [illegible] nation which, as an [illegible], in 1844. I [illegible] would be governed in all [illegible] by a determination to exact [illegible] from all, [illegible] is to all. I [illegible], them the [illegible] when a [illegible] which will be [illegible] as [illegible] makes [illegible] which from other [illegible]
+
[illegible] unreasonably  [illegible] I must be permittance [illegible] thanks. Refusing [illegible] aid in settling their business at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like an enemy from them, age worse, [illegible] if they [illegible] any natural [illegible] is leasing before them business in arrogance? So far from aiding them peacable removal, by guiding [illegible] them just wishes + thereby withdrawing all obstacles in the way of emigration. The [illegible] increases the affirmation + imitates an already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily removed by the [illegible] conforming to law + with a rigid regard to justice. Why then the determined refusal to do it? Can it be possible that "force"  is a thing [illegible] be a [illegible] reliable resort for Gov. [illegible] with a fable half [illegible] nation of Indians than [illegible] right + [illegible]? A sincere desire to have an administration which, as an [illegible], in 1844. I [illegible] would be governed in all [illegible] by a determination to exact [illegible] from all, [illegible] is to all + [illegible], them the [illegible] when a [illegible] upon a course which will be [illegible] as [illegible] makes [illegible] which from other [illegible]