Return to revision history
Revision as of 11:16:21, 13 April 2021 by Shawam6
Revision as of 22:00:23, 3 May 2021 by Shawam6
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Washington City
 
Washington City
 
Sir,  
 
Sir,  
−
W. Alexis Conquillard informs us
+
W. Alexis Coquillard informs us
−
that he has applied through the
+
that he has applied through the [illegible]: C.W. Cathcart for a comeback
 +
for the removal of the [illegible] of the Potawatamie, Ottaway,
 +
and [illegible] Indians, [illegible] to be [illegible] in the
 +
2 chr: of the Treaty made at Chicago on the 26th Sepr 1833.-
 +
W. Coquillard is the old. Trader of these [illegible], +
 +
could [illegible] successfully than any man Ive know of,
 +
called them together and remove them west now that
 +
the Government has secured a county on the Kansas for
 +
their final and permanent home.
 +
W. Coquillard has been settling up the details
 +
of the late Miami Emigration with us, and we are highly
 +
[illegible] with this conduct throughout if we honest, [illegible],
 +
and energetic, + so for us we have [illegible], satisfactory to
 +
the Indians _ he is very kind, and [illegible]to there for
 +
[illegible]; is will acquainted with all their events and will
 +
work harder and give himself [illegible] trouble to cottage [illegible],
 +
and [illegible] to their wants, than are man [illegible] have ever
 +
seen amongst them.
 +
Should the [illegible]: Indian Department see [illegible] to give
 +
a contract to W. Coquillard for the removal of these [illegible],
 +
the thiefs  from [illegible] to boo the [illegible] of Evening Chute [illegible]: of
 +
this [illegible] will [illegible] have to [illegible] funds, and provide
 +
the Miami's for its property, satisfactory, and successful execution, +
 +
will sign bonde for its performance + faithfully [illegible].