Compare revisions: OIA_Roll-418_0218
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | doubtless like to be removed west again in | + | doubtless like to be removed west again in [ineligible] of the payment of annuity for the present year, at the expense of the contractors - for the injustice of this will be so apparent that in needs [ineligible] to be mentioned to the department to secure to the contractors a release from any such approved obligation. The fact is, all these Indians referred each year to remove except those who merit. all had the offer and by hiding and [ineligible] out of the [ineligible] they could not be compelled to so unless the rest were [ineligible]. These were some 30 on 35 of the Indians who emigrated last fall, returned to Indiana after the the payment would in be justice to [ineligible] of the contractors to remove them west again? You also say in that letter that the [ineligible] above of the physician of the emigration has yet to be settled or paid out & the balance retained by the government on the contract. I settled with the physician and have his [receipt?] ", in full for his [ineligible] as physician to the Miami emigration " As the settlement with Maj Sinclear, I would say I have not yet settled with him, because he was absent from Ft Wayne at the time I was setting with the [partners?] in the [contracts?]. [ineligible], he called on judge Ewing for a settlement on the return form the west but Judge Ewing had us [ineligible] to [settle?] with [him?] as I was the active [partner] in the emigration having it solely in my [contract?]. I paid Maj. Sinclear 418$ on superintendent of Emigration for which I hold his ; objects. Will you have the goodness to send me the [ineligible] you have |