Revision: OIA_Roll-418_0092

HTML

[unintelligible] unreasonably [unintelligible] must be permittance is thanks. [unintelligible] at this request, are they now to be take that they will be treated like [unintelligible] from them [unintelligible] if they [unintelligible] natural [unintelligible] is leasing before them business [unintelligible]? So far from aiding them [unintelligible] removal, by [unintelligible] is them just wishes. I thereby withdrawing all [unintelligible] in the way of emigration. The [unintelligible] the affirmation [unintelligible] already dissatisfied people by threat of "force" There is no obstacle to their emigration except what can be easily [unintelligible] conforming to law and with a rigid [unintelligible] to [unintelligible]. Why then the determined refusal [unintelligible]? Can it be possible that "force" is a thing [unintelligible] be a [unintelligible] reliable resort for [unintelligible] with a [unintelligible] half [unintelligible] nation of Indians [unintelligible] right of [unintelligible]? [unintelligible] desire to have an [unintelligible] nation which, as an [unintelligible], in 1844. I [unintelligible] would be governed in all [unintelligible] by a determination to exact [unintelligible] from all, [unintelligible] is to all. I [unintelligible], them the [unintelligible] when a [unintelligible] which will be [unintelligible] as [unintelligible] makes [unintelligible] which from other [unintelligible]